The launching of new legal tech startups is one of the most exciting parts of ABA TECHSHOW. One of them this year was Lawyaw, a cloud-based document drafting platform. I stopped by their booth in Start-Up Alley on the expo floor to see the product and chat with David Gomez and Tucker Cottingham.

David and Tucker said Lawyaw’s big feature is using AI to improve the drafting process. They showed a feature they are working on that will allow users to upload their own Word documents and PDFs while the software does the heavy lifting to identify variables and create fields automatically. If it works well, any lawyer could create his or her own custom drafting packages fairly easily. And that’s important, because Lawyaw only has California court forms pre-loaded at this time.

Lawyaw also differs from more traditional document software by being cloud-based, meaning it will work the same on PCs and Macs. Since many programs in this category tend to run on the desktop and within Microsoft Word, this flexibility is welcome news.

Lawyaw already integrates with Clio, too, meaning it can pull client data from Clio to fill in document fields. I didn’t ask if the integration goes the other way—if data and documents created in Lawyaw can be pushed to Clio.

I did ask if drafting in Lawyaw (via a browser) will preserve detailed formatting options in Word documents. I’m talking about the details of good typography, like line spacing and kerning, that simpler online document software can’t manage. David assured me those details would be preserved.

Lawyaw also has built-in e-signatures, at no extra cost. I’m happy to see this feature becoming more common among all kinds of legal software.

My biggest unanswered question is whether Lawyaw will work for complicated drafting, such as drafting sophisticated wills and trusts. Its website currently focuses on litigation, where attorneys need to use standard court forms and can mostly fill in the blanks. My hope is that the coming features will open it up to all kinds of legal drafting.

David told me there’s still at least 3 months before Lawyaw goes fully public as a product. I’ll be keeping tabs on it until then.

6 thoughts on “First Look: Lawyaw

  1. Thank you Benjamin for supporting startups; really enjoyed reading your review. BTW, regarding Clio, the connection is indeed bi-directional. We already push contacts to Clio and are working on syncing final executed documents as well. The template builder that we demoed will support automation for a wide range of documents from engagements agreements to litigation to wills and trusts.

  2. Hey! Have you found it works for more complex Wills and Trusts since your post? Our law firm just got LawYaw and I’m struggling to see that it effectively does those yet.

    1. I did sign up for a trial of Lawyaw a few months ago to see if it could work for more complex drafting. I canceled it after concluding it didn’t have the power I wanted.

      I think Lawyaw is easy to use, but is limited when it comes to input types and conditional logic. So I think there are better options when it comes to complex drafting, like Hotdocs, The Form Tool, or Docassemble.

      1. Awesome! Glad I’m not alone in that thinking. I’ve been toying with Form Tool but read that it wasn’t as compatible with Macs (and I have a desktop at work and Mac at home). Have you liked any of those three better?

        1. Docassemble is definitely where I’ll be long-term, but it requires a pretty big investment up front to implement. It has all the power of Hotdocs in a modern and flexible package.

          I’ve been using Community Lawyer to experiment with Docassemble without having to be a developer, so you might want to check that out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *